#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 for free
#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 320kbps
#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 series
#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 download

Then, all I need to do is go to the Effects and Presets Menu, type in LUT, and click on the ‘Apply Color LUT’ effect and drag it to an Adjustment Layer to apply it.

#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 download

Our Free LUTs download options include cinematic, B&W, Portrait, Moody, and more.

#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 for free

Typically, orders of $35 USD or more (within the same shop) qualify for free After Effects. With background rendering enabled, I would get one result if I worked straight through a project, and another if I took a break for lunch in the middle.Luts after effects free. In addition, I disabled background rendering for all of my FCP X tests for a number of reasons, the most important of which was the ability to create duplicatable results. In my Compressor presets, I used multiple-pass encoding, again because this is what I recommend, and because it's also the default setting in all of the Compressor presets that I checked. I also used 2-pass VBR for encoding, because it's the setting I use in my own practice. Since this is the setting I recommend that producers use, it seemed fair to use it in my tests. While this can extend encoding time significantly, it can also increase quality, as you can learn about in this article on. When encoding in the Adobe Media Encoder, I exported with Use Maximum Render Quality enabled. Then I tried Export Using Compressor Setting, which proved significantly faster in many cases, so I ran all tests using this option.įigure 1. I started testing using the Send to Compressor option, which saved the time and disk space associated with creating an intermediate file. My thought was, if you were in that much of a hurry to get the file rendered, you would use this technique and find something else to do during the encode.įCPX offers a wide range of rendering options, as shown in Figure 1 (below). This locked up Premiere Pro for the duration, but in some instances, decreased rendering time by as much as 50%. When rendering from Premiere Pro, I exported directly from Premiere Pro, not by queuing and outputting via Adobe Media Encoder.

Workflow and Encoding Optionsīoth Premiere Pro CS6 and Final Cut Pro X enable multiple encoding workflows, so let me define which I used up front. Fortunately, in CS6, Adobe greatly expanded the list of accelerated effects, so this wasn't limiting in any way. Then I added a range of common effects, including titles, blurs, sharpening, layering via opacity adjustments, picture-in-picture, and creating a video wall, to see how these effects impacted performance.Īll the effects that I applied were GPU-accelerated via Adobe's Mercury Playback Engine and the NVIDIA graphics card, as I suspect most Adobe producers in a hurry also do. With one or two exceptions, with each format, I started with a simple test, just a single 1-minute color/brightness-adjusted video output to the H.264 target. I describe each test project in detail below. I performed all tests on an 2 x 2.93 GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro from early 2009 running MacOS X version 10.7.4 with 12 GB of RAM and an NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 graphics card with 1.5 GB of onboard RAM. I encoded at 29.97fps for 29.97 and 60p source footage, and at 23.976 for 23.976 source footage.

#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 320kbps

I used one basic output preset with each program for all tests, encoding to 720p output using the H.264 codec, Main Profile at a video data rate of 10Mbps and audio at 320Kbps stereo. The files I created could be used for uploading to a user-generated content site like YouTube or Vimeo, or an online video platform like Brightcove, Sorenson 360, or Kaltura. I tested with common formats that both Premiere Pro and FCP X could handle natively, like AVCHD, XDCAM EX, and footage from DSLRs. There are myriad formats to test and an unlimited combination of effects to apply.

#Final cut pro vs adobe premiere cs6 series

In this article I'll discuss a series of multiple-format benchmark tests that analyzed comparative performance between the two programs. There have been lots of comparisons between Final Cut Pro X and Premiere Pro CS6, with most focusing on features and workflows.